Volume 2, 2019
PERSPECTIVE

Fake Science and the Knowledge Crisis: Ignorance can be Fatal

PDF
  • Henning Hopf
    ,
  • Alain Krief
    ,
  • Goverdhan Mehta
    ,
  • Stephen A. Matlin
Henning Hopf
International Organization for Chemical Sciences in Development, 61 rue de Bruxelles, 5000 Namur, Belgium
Alain Krief
Chemistry Department, Namur University, 5000 Namur, Belgium
Goverdhan Mehta
School of Chemistry, University of Hyderabad, Hyderabad - 500046, Telangana
Stephen A. Matlin
Institute of Global Health Innovation, Imperial College London, London SW7 2AZ, UK

Published 2023-09-02

Keywords

  • Fake Science, Trust In Science, Knowledge Crisis

How to Cite

Hopf, H., Krief, A., Mehta, G., & Matlin, S. A. (2023). Fake Science and the Knowledge Crisis: Ignorance can be Fatal. DIALOGUE: Science, Scientists and Society, 2, 1–7. Retrieved from https://dialogue.ias.ac.in/index.php/dialogue/article/view/24

Abstract

Computers, the Internet and social media enable every individual to be a publisher, communicating true or false information instantly andglobally. In the ‘post-truth’ era,deception iscommonplace at all levels of contemporary life. Fakery affects science and social information and the two have become highly interactive globally, undermining trust in science and the capacity of individuals and society to make evidence-informed choices, including on life-ordeath issues. Ironically, drivers of fake science are embedded in the current science publishing system intended to disseminate evidenced knowledge, in which the intersection of science advancement and reputational and financial rewards for scientists and publishers incentivize gaming and, in the extreme, creation and promotion of falsified results. In the battle for truth, individual scientists, professional associations, academic institutions and funding bodies must act to put their own house in order by promoting ethics and integrity and de-incentivizing the production and publishing of false data and results. They must speak out against false information and fake science in circulation and forcefully contradict public figures who promote it. They must contribute to research that helps understand and counter false information, to education that builds knowledge and skills in assessing informationandtostrengtheningscience literacyinsociety

PDF

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

  1. Ban G, Ban Z. 111AD Book of Han. See https:// www.revolvy.com/page/Seek-truth-from-facts.
  2. Rao TSS, Andrade C. 2011 The MMR vaccine and autism: sensation, refutation, retraction, and fraud. Indian J. Psychiatry 53, 95–96. (doi:10.4103/0019-5545.82529)
  3. Hviid A, Hansen JV, Frisch M, Melbye M. 2019 Measles, mumps, rubella vaccination and autism: a nationwide cohort study. Ann.Intern. Med. 170, 513–520. (doi:10.7326/ M18-2101)
  4. Measles cases hit record high in the European Region. 2018 WHO European Region, Copenhagen, Denmark, 20 August 2018. See http://www.euro.who.int/en/media-centre/ sections/press-releases/2018/measles-cases-hitrecordhigh-in-the-european-region.
  5. Kestenbaum LA, Feemster KA. 2015 Identifying and addressing vaccine hesitancy. Pediatr. Ann.
  6. , e71–e75. (doi:10.3928/0090448120150410-07)
  7. Larson HJ. 2018 The biggest pandemic risk? Viral misinformation. Nature 562, 309. (doi:10.1038/d41586-018-07034-4)
  8. Watts J. 2018 We have 12 years to limit climate change catastrophe, warns UN. The Guardian, 8 October 2018. See https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2018/oct/08/global-warmingmustnot-exceed-15c-warns-landmark-un-report.
  9. Propaganda and practice. 2017 Human Rights Watch 19 July 2017. See https://www.hrw.org/ reports/1999/rwanda/Geno1-3-10.htm.
  10. Romano A. 2018 Twitter released 9 million tweets from one Russian troll farm. Here’s what we learned. Vox, 19 October 2018. See https:// www.vox.com/2018/10/19/17990946/twitterrussiantrolls-bots-election-tampering.
  11. Brownell KD, Warner KE. 2009 The perils of ignoring history: Big Tobacco played dirty and millions died. How similar is Big Food? Milbank Q. 87, 259–294. (doi:10.1111/j.1468-0009.2009.00555.x)
  12. Smith J, Thompson S, Lee K. 2017 Death and taxes: the framing of the causes and policy responses to the illicit tobacco trade in Canadian newspapers. Cogent. Soc. Sci.3, 1325054 (doi:10.1080/23311886.2017.1325054)
  13. Masood E. 2018 Why academic freedom is needed more than ever. Nature 563, 621–623.(doi:10.1038/d41586-018-07518-3)
  14. Cillizza C. 2018 Donald Trump buried a climate change report because ’I don’t believe it’. CNN, 27 November 2018. See https://edition.cnn.com/ 2018/11/26/politics/donald-trump-climatechange/ index.html.
  15. Qiu L. 2018 Fact check of the day: the baseless claim that climate scientists are ‘driven’ by money. New York Times, 27 November 2018. See https://www.nytimes.com/2018/11/27/us/ politics/climate-report-fact-check.html.
  16. Harnad S. 1991 Post-Gutenberg galaxy: the fourth revolution in the means of production of knowledge. Public-Access Comput. Syst. Rev. 2, 39–53. See http://cogprints.org/1580/1/ harnad91.postgutenberg.html.
  17. Orwell G. 1943 Looking back on the Spanish War. New Road, London. See http://orwell.ru/library/essays/Spanish_ War/english/esw_1.
  18. Keyes R. 2004 The post-truth era: dishonesty and deception in contemporary life. New York, NY: St Martin’s Press. (http://www.ralphkeyes.com/theposttruthera/contents/).
  19. Iyengar S, Massey DS. 2019 Scientific communication in a post-truth society. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 7656–7661. (doi:10.1073/pnas.1805868115)
  20. Kofman A. 2018 Bruno Latour, the post-truth philosopher, mounts a defence of science. New York Times Magazine, 25 October 2018. See https://www.nytimes.com/2018/10/25/ magazine/bruno-latour-post-truth-philosopherscience.html.
  21. Department for Universities, Innovations and Skills. 2008 Public attitudes to science. See https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/ government/uploads/system/uploads/ attachment_data/file/260669/bis-08p111-public-attitudes-to-science-2008survey.pdf.
  22. Funk C. 2017 Mixed messages about public trust in science. Issues Sci. Technol. 34. See https://issues.org/realnumbersmixed-messages-about-publictrustin-science/.
  23. Nichols T. 2017 The death of expertise: the campaign against established knowledge and why it matters. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
  24. Siegel E. 2018 Science is not fake news. Forbes, 29 November 2018. See https://www.forbes.com/sites/startswithabang/2018/11/29/scienceisnot-fake-news/#746df4d16f0c.
  25. Matlin SA, Mehta G, Krief A, Hopf H. 2017 The scientific publishing conundrum: a perspective from chemistry. Beilstein Magazine 3. (doi:10.3762/bmag.9)
  26. Brainard J, You J. 2018 What a massive database of retracted papers reveals about science publishing’s ‘death penalty’. Science, 25 October 2018. (doi:10.1126/science.aav8384)
  27. Eckert S, Sumner C, Krause T. 2018 Inside the fake science factory. 2018 Presentation at DEF CON 26, Las Vegas, 11 August. See https:// media.defcon.org/DEF%20CON%2026/DEF% 20CON%2026%20presentations/Svea% 20Eckert%20-%20Chris%20Sumner%20-% 20Tim%20Krause/DEFCON-26-Eckert-SumnerKrause-Inside-the-Fake-Science-FactoryUpdated.pdf
  28. Lazer DMJ et al. 2018 The science of fake news. Science 359, 1094–1096. (doi:10.1126/science.aao2998)
  29. Ciampaglia GL, Menczer F. 2018 Misinformation and biases infect social media, both intentionally and accidentally. The Conversation, 20 June 2018. See https://phys.org/news/ 2018–06-misinformation-biases-infect-socialmedia.html.
  30. Temming MT. 2018 Scientists enlist computers to hunt down fake news. Science News For Students, 27 September 2018. See https://www.sciencenewsforstudents.org/ article/scientists-enlist-computers-hunt-down-fake-news.
  31. Gonzalez R. 2018 Facebook opens its private servers to scientists studying fake news. Wired, 11 July 2018. See https://www.wired.com/story/ social-science-one-facebook-fake-news/.
  32. Rone J. 2018 Collateral damage: how algorithms to counter ‘fake news’ threaten citizen media in Bulgaria. London School of Economics and Political Science, Media Policy Project, published online 18 June 2018. See https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/mediapolicyproject/2018/ 06/18/collateral-damage-how-algorithms-tocounterfake-news-threaten-citizen-media-inbulgaria/.
  33. UK Government. 2018 Social media and online platforms as publishers. House of Lords Debate Res. Briefing, 11 January 2018. See https:// researchbriefings.parliament.uk/ ResearchBriefing/Summary/LLN-2018-0003.
  34. Levin ST. 2018 Is Facebook a publisher? In public it says no, but in court it says yes. The Guardian, 3 July 2018. See https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2018/jul/02/ facebook-mark-zuckerberg-platform-publisherlawsuit.
  35. Jankowicz N. 2018 Social media self-regulation has failed. Here’s what Congress can do about it. Medium, 29 November 2018. See https:// medium.com/@nina.jankowicz/social-mediaselfregulation-has-failed-heres-what-congresscando-about-it-5b38b6bf9840.
  36. World Economic Forum. 2018 Digital wildfires in a hyperconnected world. Global risks 2013, 8th edn. See http://reports.weforum.org/globalrisks2013/risk-case-1/digital-wildfires-in-ahyperconnectedworld/?doing_wp_ cron=1551978334.8959839344024658203125.
  37. Kalsnes B. 2018 Fake news. Oxford Research Encyclopedias: Communication published online September 2018. (doi:10.1093/acrefore/ 9780190228613.013.809)
  38. CNeTS member provides expertise on misinformation battle at AAAS conference. CNetS 15 February 2019. See http://cnets.indiana.edu/blog/tag/misinformation/.
  39. What’s trending in fake news? Tools show what stories go viral, and if bots are to blame. Science Daily, 17 May 2018. See https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2018/05/ 180517163327.htm.
  40. Vosoughi S, Roy D, Aral S. 2018 The spread of true and false news online. Science 359, 1146–1151. (doi:10.1126/science.aap9559)
  41. Rutjens BT. 2018 What makes people distrust science? Surprisingly, not politics. Aeon, 28 May 2018. See https://aeon.co/ideas/what-makespeopledistrust-science-surprisingly-not-politics.
  42. WhatsApp selects 20 teams to curb fake news globally, including in India. NDTV News Service, 13 November 2018. See https://www.ndtv.com/india-news/whatsapp-selects-20teams-to-curb-fake-news-globally-includinginindia-1946482. royalsocietypublishing.org/journal/rsos R. Soc. open sci. 6: 190161 6
  43. Mohan N. 2018 Scientists hold key to winning fight against ’fake news’. Phys. org, 25 May 2018. See https://phys.org/news/2018-05scientists-key-fake-news.html.
  44. Bradley S, Beall A. 2017 The best science accounts to follow on Instagram and Twitter. Wired, 3 November 2017. See https://www.wired.co.uk/article/the-best-scientists-to-followoninstagram-and-twitter.
  45. Fox F. 2018 Scientists must keep fighting fake news, not retreat to their ivory towers. The Guardian, 3 September 2018. See https://www.theguardian.com/science/blog/2018/sep/03/ scientists-must-keep-fighting-fake-news-notretreatto-their-ivory-towers.
  46. Tattersall A. 2018 In the era of Brexit and fake news, scientists need to embrace social media.
  47. The Conversation, 17 July 2018. See https:// theconversation.com/in-the-era-of-brexit-andfakenews-scientists-need-to-embrace-socialmedia100040.
  48. Cochrane Australia’s response to ’fake science’ fish oil claims. Cochrane Australia, July 2018. See https://australia.cochrane.org/news/cochraneaustraliasresponse-fake-science-fish-oil-claims.
  49. Tsipursky G. 2018 (Dis)trust in science: can we cure the scourge of misinformation? Sci. Am. 5 July 2018. See https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/observations/dis-trust-in-science/.
  50. Center for Science and Democracy. 2019 Attacks on science. Union of Concerned Scientists, March 2019. See https://www.ucsusa.org/centerscienceand-democracy/attacks-on-science.
  51. Padma TV. 2019 Indian scientists protest against unscientific claims made at conference. Nature 565, 274. (doi:10.1038/d41586-019-00073-5)
  52. Scheufele DA, Krause NM. 2019 Science audiences, misinformation, and fake news. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 116, 7662–7669. (doi:10.1073/pnas.1805871115)
  53. Nehru J. 1946 The discovery of India, p. 512. New York, NY: John Day.
  54. Tattersall A. 2018 New research must be better reported, the future of society depends on it. The Conversation, 8 January 2018. See https://theconversation.com/new-research-must-bebetter-reported-the-future-of-society-dependson-it-87407.
  55. Brainard J, You J. 2018 What a massive database of retracted papers reveals about science publishing’s ‘death penalty’. Science, 25 October 2018. See http://www.sciencemag.org/news/2018/10/what-massive-databaseretracted-papers-reveals-about-sciencepublishing-s-death-penalty.
  56. Impey C. 2018 Alarmed by fake news? Fake science is just as serious of a problem. Salon, 27 November 2018. See https://www.salon.com/2018/11/27/alarmed-by-fake-news-fake-scienceis-just-as-serious-of-a-problem/.
  57. Ravindranath P. 2017 India’s white list to curb researchers from publishing in predatory journals. Science Chronicle, 16 January 2017. See https://journosdiary.com/2017/01/16/india-ugcpredatory-journals/.
  58. Fryling-Indiana K. 2018 Scientists call for action in fight against ‘fake news’. Futurity, 9 March 2018. See https://www.futurity.org/fightingfake-news-1699352/.
  59. Maslog C. 2017 How can scientists fight the tide of ‘fake news’? Open University, 2 November 2017. See https://www.open.edu/openlearn/science-maths-technology/acrossthe-sciences/how-can-scientists-fight-the-tidefake-news.
  60. Bourguignon J-P. 2018 Scientists can lead the fight against fake news. World Economic Forum
  61. Annual Meeting of the New Champions, 16 September 2018. See https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2018/09/scientists-can-lead-thefight-against-fake-news/.
  62. Cook J. 2016 Countering climate science denial and communicating scientific consensus. Oxford Research Encyclopedias: Climate Science published online October 2016 (doi:10.1093/acrefore/9780190228620.013.314)