Volume 5
Special Issue-Inquiring into Technoscience in India

‘Citizen Science’ in ecology in India - B

PDF
  • Pankaj Sekhsaria
    ,
  • Naveen Tayyil
Pankaj Sekhsaria
Associate Professor, Centre for Technology Alternatives for Rural Areas (CTARA), IIT Bombay. This paper is based on a research project carried out when he was Senior Scientist, DST Centre for Policy Research, IIT Delhi
Naveen Tayyil
Associate Professor, Department of Humanities and Social Science, IIT Delhi

Published 2023-09-03

Keywords

  • Science; citizen; citizen science; ecology; participation; research

How to Cite

Sekhsaria, P., & Tayyil, N. (2023). ‘Citizen Science’ in ecology in India - B. DIALOGUE: Science, Scientists and Society, 5, 1–24. Retrieved from https://dialogue.ias.ac.in/index.php/dialogue/article/view/51

Abstract

The emergence of Citizen Science can be understood as the coming together of three broad contemporary trends at the intersection of scientific research and environmental regulation: the growing awareness among the public on matters of the environment, the growing availability of (big) data that has been facilitated by the rapid evolution of technologies of data gathering, transmission and analysis, all of which would broadly constitute the frame of ‘big data.’ The third of these trends is the increased interest and participation of the citizenry in scientific research and environmental monitoring on the one hand and regulation on the other. This paper is based on a detailed study of 17 different selfidentified Citizen Science projects currently underway in India and seeks to provide trends, analysis and insight on this rapidly growing way of ‘doing science.’ Analysis and key findings are based on quantitative and qualitative assessments. The quantitative dimensions discuss the number of citizens participating, the volume of data contributed and collected and the time frames which the different projects operate within. The qualitative aspects of discussion are related to matters such as the concept of 'voluntarity,' the citizen science nomenclature, the possibility of challenging existing power structures within scientific research that citizen science offers, issues of data ownership and regulation and also on the promises and limitations of the technological interfaces that make Citizen Science possible.

PDF

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

  1. Behrawala, K. 2018, April 8. They study galaxies, help predict landslides: Meet India’s citizen scientists. Hindustan Times. Retrieved from https:// www.hindustantimes.com/ science/ theystudy- galaxies-help-predict-landslides-meet-india-s-citizen-scientists/ storyoa9N5IdjNbeLO6sCJy56NJ. html
  2. Perinchery A. 2018, March 17 A feather in your app: Citizen science has come of age. The Hindu Sunday Magazine. Retrieved from https:// www.thehindu.com/ sci-tech/ energy-andenvironment/ a-feather-in-your-app-citizen-science-has-come-of-age/ article23279945.ece
  3. Agnihotri S., Hiremath, A., Vattakavan, T., Sachin, M. H. and George, R. 2016, March 1-15. Alien among us. Down to Earth, 50–52.
  4. Gubbi S. 2018, July 21 PopSci - In it together. Deccan Herald. Retrieved from https:// www.deccanherald.com/ sunday-herald/ sh-top-stories/ popsci-it-together-682648.html
  5. Ramaswami G. and Quader, S. 2018 The case of the confusing Kanikonna trees. Retrieved July 5, 2018, from https:// thewire.in/ environment/ the-case-of-the-confusing-kanikonna-trees
  6. Vattakaven T., George R. M., Balabsubramanian D., Rejou-Mechain M., Muthusankar G., Ramesh B. R. and Prabhakar R. (2016). India Biodiversity Portal: An integrated, interactive and participatory biodiversity informatics platform. Biodiversity Data Journal. https:// doi.org/ 10.3897/ BDJ.4.e10279
  7. Datta A., Naniwadekar R., Rao M., Sreenivasan R. and Hiresavi V. 2018 Hornbill Watch: A citizen science initiative for Indian hornbills. Indian Birds, 14(3), 65–70.
  8. Arjun C. P. and Roshnath R. 2018. Status of Greater Flamingos Phoenicopterus roseus in Kerala. Indian Birds, 14(2), 43–45.
  9. Baidya P. and Bhagat M. 2018. A checklist of the birds of Goa, India. Indian Birds, 14(1), 1–31.
  10. Baidya P., Bhagat M., Dharwadkar, O. and Gauns H. 2017 Seabirds of Goa, India: Recent updates. Indian Birds, 13(1), 8–17.
  11. Kannan R., Santharam V., Kannan A. and Nagarajan V. M. 2018 True winter distribution of the Forest Wagtail Dendronanthus indicus in India. Indian Birds, 14(2), 33–36.
  12. Praveen J. 2017 On the geo-precision of data for modelling home range of a species – A commentary on Ramesh et al. (2017). Biological Conservation, 213, 245–246.
  13. Praveen J., Subramanya S. and Mohan Raj V. 2016 A checklist of the birds of Karnataka. Indian Birds, 12(4–5), 89–118.
  14. Ramesh V., Gopalakrishna T., Barve S and Melnick, D. J. (2017b). IUCN greatly underestimates threat levels of endemic birds in the Western Ghats. Biological Conservation, 210 (205–221).
  15. Ramesh V., Gopalakrishna T., Barve S. and Melnick, D. J. 2017a) Finer spatial resolution improves accuracy of species distribution models in heterogeneous landscapes – A response to Praveen J. Biological Conservation, 213, 247–248.
  16. Roshnath R. 2017 Wintering of the Grey-headed Lapwing Vanellus cinereus (Aves: Charadriiformes: Charadriidae) in Kerala, India. Journal of Threatened Taxa, 9(8), 10613–10617.
  17. Bonney R. 1996 Citizen science: A lab tradition. Living Bird, 15(4), 7–15.
  18. Bonney R., Phillips T., Ballard H. I. and Enck J. W. 2016 Can Citizen Science Enhance Public Understanding of Science? Public Understanding of Science, 25(1), 2–16.
  19. Miller-Rushing A., Primack R. and Bonney R. 2012 The history of public participation in ecological research. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 10(6), 285–290.
  20. Irwin A. 1995 Citizen Science: A Study of People, Expertise and Sustainable Development. London: Routledge.
  21. Theobald E., Ettinger A., Burgess, H., DeBey L., Schmidt N., Froehlich, H. … Parrish, J. K. 2015. Global Change and local solutions: Tapping the unrealized potential of citizen science for biodiversity research. Biological Conservation, 181, 236–244.
  22. Anon. 2016. Conference Guide - First International ECSA Conference 2016. Berlin: ECSA. Retreived from https:// ec.europa.eu/ jrc/ en/ event/ conference/ first-ecsa-conference-2016
  23. Felt U., Fouche R., Miller C. A. and Smith-Doerr L. (Eds.) 2017 The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
  24. Hackett E. J., Amsterdamska O., Lynch M. and Wajcman, J. (Eds.) 2008 The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, Third Edition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  25. Rahmani A., Laad S. and Islam, Z. 2003, November Status of the AWC in India and future development. Newsletter of the Asian Waterbird Census, 4–5. Retrieved from https:// southasia. wetlands.org/ wp-content/ uploads/ sites/ 8/dlm_uploads/ 2018/ 02/ AWC-NL6.pdf
  26. Ghosh P. 2018, March 5 A bullfrog invasion in the Andamans is threatening biodiversity. Mongabay India. Retrieved from https:// scroll.in/ article/ print/ 870601
  27. Mohanty N. P. and Measey, J. 2018 Reconstructing biological invasions using public surveys: a new approach to retrospectively assess spatio-temporal changes in invasive spread. Biological Invasions. https:// doi.org/ https:// doi.org/ 10.1007/ s10530-018-1839-4
  28. Mohanty N. P., Sachin A., Selvaraj G. and Vasudevan, K. 2018 Using public surveys to reliably and rapidly estimate the distributions of multiple invasive species on the Andaman archipelago. Biotropica. https:// doi.org/ 10.1111/ btp.12534
  29. Citizen Sparrow Report 2012 Retrieved from www.citizensparrow.in
  30. Harvey G. K. A., Nelson T. A., Pacquet P. C., Ferster C. J. and Fox, C. H. 2018. Comparing citizen science reports and systematic surveys of marine mammal distributions and densities. Biological Conservation, 226, 92–100.