Volume 5
Special Issue-Inquiring into Technoscience in India

Building a Bus: Technoscience and The Emerging Mode of Organising Interventions in Indian Cities

PDF
  • Govind Gopakumar
    ,
  • Yogi Joseph
Govind Gopakumar
Concordia University, Montreal
Yogi Joseph
Concordia University, Montreal

Published 2023-09-03

Keywords

  • Cities, India; Big Science, Urban Science

How to Cite

Gopakumar , G., & Joseph, Y. (2023). Building a Bus: Technoscience and The Emerging Mode of Organising Interventions in Indian Cities. DIALOGUE: Science, Scientists and Society, 5, 1–22. Retrieved from https://dialogue.ias.ac.in/index.php/dialogue/article/view/52

Abstract

Despite the growing economic footprint of cities, surprisingly little attention has been devoted to understanding the relation between technoscience and cities. The field of urban technoscience seeks to develop a body of knowledge to plan and design vital urban metabolic flows including water, waste, sanitation, movement, and energy. Underlying this field is the urgency to intervene in cities to solve urban problems in a scientific fashion through the development of infrastructure plans and designs. As vital sites for India’s current political economy, cities are now witness to systematic attempts to alter the technoscientific base of cities in the country. How is this shift happening in India? Drawing upon research in Science and Technology Studies (STS), history of urban planning, and allied social science fields, this paper characterizes the shift as BUS – Big Urban Science and Engineering. The paper provides an analysis of BUS and concludes with some implications of BUS for urban change in India.

PDF

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

  1. Farias, I. and Blok, A. 2017. STS in the city. In The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, (eds. U. Felt, R. Fouche, C. A. Miller, and L. Smith-Doerr), Fourth Edition, pp.555–82. The MIT Press, Cambridge.
  2. Kumar, A., Vidyarthi, S., and Prakash, P. 2020. City Planning in India, 1947–2017. Routledge, London.
  3. Elzinga, A. 2004. Metaphors, Models and Reification in Science and Technology Policy Discourse. Science as Culture 13 (1): 105–21.
  4. Harvey, D. 2001. Globalization and the “spatial fix.” Geographische Revue: Zeitschrift Für Literatur Und Diskussion 3 (2): 23–30.
  5. Peck, J., Theodore, N., and Brenner, N. 2009. Neoliberal Urbanism: Models, Moments, Mutations. SAIS Review 29 (1): 49–66.
  6. Ward, K. and McCann, E. 2011. Conclusion. Cities Assembled: Space, Neoliberalization, (Re)territorialization, and Comparison. In Mobile Urbanism: Cities and Policymaking in the Global Age, (eds. E. McCann and K. Ward). University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, MN.
  7. Percival, T. and Waley, P. 2012. Articulating Intra-Asian Urbanism: The Production of Satellite Cities in Phnom Penh. Urban Studies 49 (13): 2873–88.
  8. Zhang, J. 2012. From Hong Kong’s Capitalist Fundamentals to Singapore’s Authoritarian Governance: The Policy Mobility of Neo-liberalising Shenzhen, China. Urban Studies 49 (13): 2853–71.
  9. Yap, E. X. Y. 2012. Wheels of Fame and Fortune: The Travels of the Singapore Flyer. Urban Studies 49 (13): 2839–52.
  10. Roy, A. and Ong, A., eds. 2011. Worlding Cities: Asian Experiments and the Art of Being Global. Blackwell Publishing Ltd, Chichester.
  11. King, A. D. 1990. Urbanism, Colonialism, and the World-Economy. Routledge, London.
  12. Melosi, M. 2000. The Sanitary City: Environmental Services in Urban America from Colonial Times to the Present. University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh.
  13. Melosi, M. 1990. Cities, technical systems and the environment. Environmental History Review Spring/ Summer: 45–64.
  14. Spodek, H. 2013. City planning in India under British Rule. Economic & Political Weekly 48 (4): 53–61.
  15. Kalia, R. 2006. Modernism, modernization and post‐colonial India: A reflective essay. Planning Perspectives 21 (2): 133–56.
  16. Arnold, D. 2013. Nehruvian science and postcolonial India. Isis 104 (2): 360–70.
  17. Raina, D. 1997. Evolving perspectives on science and history: A chronicle of modern India’s scientific enchantment and disenchantment (1850–1980). Social Epistemology 11 (1): 3–24.
  18. Vidyarthi, S., Hoch, C., and Basmajian, C. 2013. Making sense of India’s spatial plan-making practice: Enduring approach or emergent variations? Planning Theory & Practice 14 (1): 57– 74.
  19. Banerjee, T. 2009. US planning expeditions to postcolonial India: From ideology to innovation in technical assistance. Journal of the American Planning Association 75 (2): 193–208.
  20. Raina, D. 2014. The problem. Seminar 654 (February): 12–14.
  21. Vidyarthi, S., Mathur, S., and Agrawal, S. 2017. Understanding India’s New Approach to Spatial Planning and Development: A Salient Shift? Oxford University Press, New Delhi.
  22. Vidyarthi, S. 2010. Inappropriately appropriated or innovatively indigenized?: Neighborhood unit concept in post-independence India. Journal of Planning History 9 (4): 260–76.
  23. Vidyarthi, S. 2018. Spatial plans in post-liberalization India: Who’s making the plans for fastgrowing Indian urban regions? Journal of Urban Affairs 0 (0): 1–18.
  24. Evans, J., Karvonen, A., and Raven, R., eds. 2016. The Experimental City. Routledge, London.
  25. Karvonen, A. and Heur, B. van. 2014. Urban Laboratories: Experiments in Reworking Cities. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 38 (2): 379–92.
  26. Batty, M. 2013. The New Science of Cities. MIT Press, Cambridge.
  27. Kitchin, R. 2016. The ethics of smart cities and urban science. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A 374 (2083): 1–15.
  28. Kitchin, R. 2017. Urban Science: A short primer. Programmable City Working Paper 23. Maynooth University.
  29. Smith, R. M. and Pathak, P. A. 2018. Urban sustainability in India: Green buildings, AMRUT yojana, and smart cities. In Metropolitan Governance in Asia and the Pacific Rim: Borders, Challenges, Futures, (eds. B. Grant, C. Y. Liu, and L. Ye), pp.163–91. Springer, New Delhi.
  30. Mahadevia, D. 2011. Branded and renewed? Policies, politics and processes of urban development in the reform era. Economic & Political Weekly 46 (31): 56–64.
  31. Smith, R. M., Pathak, P. A., and Agrawal, G. 2019. India’s “smart” cities mission: A preliminary examination into India’s newest urban development policy. Journal of Urban Affairs 41 (4): 518–34.
  32. Burte, H. 2014. The “smart city” card. Economic & Political Weekly 49 (46): 22–25.
  33. Williams, G., Mahadevia, D., Schindler, S., and Chattaraj, S. 2021. Megaprojects, mirages and miracles: territorializing the Delhi–Mumbai Industrial Corridor (DMIC) and state restructuring in contemporary India. Territory, Politics, Governance 0 (0): 1–22.
  34. Weinberg, A. M. 1968. Reflections on Big Science. MIT Press, Cambridge.
  35. Capshew, J. H. and Rader, K. A. 1992. Big science: Price to the present. Osiris 7: 2–25.
  36. Elzinga, A. 2012. Features of the current science policy regime: Viewed in historical perspective. Science and Public Policy 39 (4): 416–28.
  37. Mirowski, P. and Sent, E.-M. 2008. The commercialization of science, and the response of STS. In The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, (eds. E. J. Hackett, O. Amsterdamska, M. Lynch, and J. Wajcman), pp.635–90. The MIT Press, Cambridge.
  38. Hallonsten, O. 2016. Big Science Transformed: Science, Politics and Organization in Europe and the United States. Palgrave Macmillan, Switzerland.
  39. Mirowski, P. 2011. Science-Mart: Privatizing American Science. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
  40. Weinberg, A. M. 1963. Criteria for scientific choice. Minerva 1 (2): 159–71.
  41. Galison, P. 1992. The Many Faces of Big Science. In Big Science: The Growth of Large-Scale Research, (eds. P. Galison and B. W. Hevly), pp.1–20. Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA.
  42. Gopakumar, G. 2014. Experiments and counter-experiments in the urban laboratory of watersupply partnerships in india. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 38 (2): 393– 412.
  43. Kundu, D. and Samanta, D. 2011. Redefining the inclusive urban agenda in India. Economic & Political Weekly 46 (5): 55–63.
  44. Narayan, P. 2018. The informal local: A multi-scalar approach to examining participation in urban renewal. In Urban Renewal, Community and Participation: Theory, Policy and Practice, (eds. J. Clark and N. Wise), pp.199–217. The Urban Book Series. Springer International Publishing, New York.
  45. Banerjee-Guha, S. 2009. Neoliberalising the “urban”: New geographies of power and injustice in Indian cities. Economic & Political Weekly 44 (22): 95–107.
  46. Badami, M. G. 2009. Urban transport policy as if people and the environment mattered: Pedestrian accessibility the first step. Economic & Political Weekly 44 (33): 43–51.
  47. Dargay, J., Gately, D., and Sommer, M. 2007. Vehicle ownership and income growth, worldwide: 1960-2030. The Energy Journal 28 (4): 143–70.
  48. Bouachera, T. and Mazraati, M. 2007. Fuel demand and car ownership modelling in India. OPEC Review 31 (1): 27–51.
  49. Mittal, S., Dai, H., and Shukla, P. R. 2016. Low carbon urban transport scenarios for China and India: A comparative assessment. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment 44 (May): 266–76.
  50. iDeCK. 2006. Revised City Development Plan for Bangalore. Karnataka Urban Infrastructure Development and Finance Corporation, Bangalore.
  51. Sadoway, D., Gopakumar, G., Baindur, V., and Badami, M. G. 2018. JNNURM as a window on urban governance - Its Institutional Footprints, Antecedents, and Legacy. Economic & Political Weekly 53 (2): 71–81.
  52. Baindur, V. 2017. The politics of entrepreneurial vision group plans and their impact at the local (government) level, Bengaluru. In Entrepreneurial Urbanism in India : The Politics of Spatial Restructuring and Local Contestation, (ed. K. C. Smitha), pp.113–33. Springer, Singapore.
  53. Coelho, K., Kamath, L., and Vijayabaskar, M., eds. 2013. Participolis: Consent and Contention in Neoliberal Urban India. Routledge, London.
  54. McKinsey Global Institute. 2010. India’s Urban Awakening: Building Inclusive Cities, Sustaining Economic Growth. McKinsey Global Institute, New York.
  55. Edwards, P. N. 2003. Infrastructure and modernity: Force, time, and social organization in the history of sociotechnical systems. In Modernity and Technology, (eds. T. J. Misa, P. Brey, and A. Feenberg), 1:pp.185–226. MIT Press, Cambridge.
  56. Hård, M. and Misa, T. J., eds. 2008. Urban Machinery: Inside Modern European Cities. MIT Press, Cambridge.
  57. Hall, P. 2014. Cities of Tomorrow: An Intellectual History of Urban Planning and Design since 1880. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester.
  58. Gandy, M. 2006. The bacteriological city and its discontents. Historical Geography 34 (1): 14– 25.
  59. Mumford, L. 1961. The City in History. Harcourt, New York.
  60. Ghosh, J., Sen, A., and Chandrasekhar, C. P. 1997. All dressed up and nowhere to go: India infrastructure report. Economic & Political Weekly 32 (16): 803–8.
  61. Kundu, A. 2001. Institutional innovations for urban infrastructural development: The Indian scenario. Development in Practice 11 (2–3): 174–89.
  62. Mahadevia, D. 2003. Globalisation, Urban Reforms & Metropolitan Response: India. Manak Publications, New Delhi.
  63. Ahluwahlia I. J. 2014. Transforming Our Cities: Postcards of Change. The Express Group Book Series. HarperCollins Publishers India, New Delhi.
  64. Sivaramakrishnan, K. C. 2011. Re-Visioning Indian Cities: The Urban Renewal Mission. Sage Publications India Pvt Ltd, New Delhi.
  65. Harris, A. and Moore, S. 2013. Planning histories and practices of circulating urban knowledge. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 37 (5): 1499–1509.
  66. King, A. D. 1977. Exporting “Planning”: The colonial and neo-colonial experience. Urbanism Past & Present 5: 12–22.
  67. Banerjee, T. and Chakravorty, S. 1994. Transfer of planning technology and local political economy: A retrospective analysis of Calcutta’s planning. Journal of the American Planning Association 60 (1): 71–82.
  68. Gieryn, T. F. 2006. City as truth-spot: Laboratories and field-sites in urban studies. Social Studies of Science 36 (1): 5–38.
  69. King, A. D. 1980. Colonialism and the development of the modern Asian city: Some theoretical considerations. In The City in South Asia: Pre-Modern and Modern, (eds. K. Ballhatchet and J. Harrison). Curzon Press, London.
  70. King, A. D. 1989. Colonialism, urbanism and the capitalist world economy. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 13 (1): 1–18.
  71. Corburn, J. 2012. Reconnecting urban planning and public health. In The Oxford Handbook of Urban Planning, (eds. R. Crane and R. Weber), pp.392–417. Oxford University Press, New York.
  72. Pivo, G., Ellis, C., Leaf, M., and Magutu, G. 1990. Physical planning thought: Retrospect and prospect. Journal of Architectural and Planning Research 7 (1): 53–70.
  73. Neuman, M. and Smith, S. 2010. City Planning and Infrastructure: Once and Future Partners. Journal of Planning History 9 (1): 21–42.
  74. Munshi, I. 2000. Patrick Geddes: Sociologist, environmentalist and town planner. Economic & Political Weekly 35 (6): 485–91.
  75. Srinivas, S. 2016. A Place for Utopia: Urban Designs from South Asia. University of Washington Press, Seattle.
  76. Rao-Cavale, K. 2017. Patrick Geddes in India: Anti-colonial nationalism and the historical time of “Cities in Evolution.” Landscape and Urban Planning, Special Issue: Planning living cities: Patrick Geddes’ legacy in the new millennium, 166 (October): 71–81.
  77. Karvonen, A., Cugurullo, F., and Caprotti, F., eds. 2019. Inside Smart Cities: Place, Politics and Urban Innovation. Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, London.
  78. Downey, G. L. and Lucena, J. C. 1995. Engineering studies. In Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, (eds. S. Jasanoff, G. E. Markle, J. C. Peterson, and T. Pinch), pp.167–88. SAGE Publications, New York.
  79. Avashia, V. K. and Garg, A. 2015. Urban infrastructure and governance mission under JNNURM. Economic & Political Weekly 51 (2): 7–8.
  80. Gopakumar, G. 2015. Intrusiveness of urban renewal in India: JNNURM as a development fix. Canadian Journal of Development Studies / Revue Canadienne d’études Du Développement 36 (1): 89–106.
  81. Hoelscher, K. 2016. The evolution of the smart cities agenda in India. International Area Studies Review 19 (1): 28–44.
  82. Sarewitz, D. 1996. Frontiers of Illusion - Science, Technology and the Politics of Progress. Temple University Press, Philadelphia.