Volume 5
Special Issue-Inquiring into Technoscience in India

Public Participation and Citizen Science in India: Roads Not Taken

PDF
  • Shambu Prasad C.
Shambu Prasad C.
Professor, Institute of Rural Management Anand (IRMA)

Published 2023-09-03

Keywords

  • No Keywords

How to Cite

C., S. P. (2023). Public Participation and Citizen Science in India: Roads Not Taken. DIALOGUE: Science, Scientists and Society, 5, 1–18. Retrieved from https://dialogue.ias.ac.in/index.php/dialogue/article/view/58

Abstract

Science policy in India has historically been the domain of experts with little consultation and peoples’ participation. While the new Indian Science, Technology and Innovation Policy offers promise with themes for equity and inclusion, there is a need to fundamentally rethink the contract between science and society and the role of public participation in science in India. People’s Science Movements in India have pointed to many such possibilities in the past but often views outside the formal scientific establishment receive little attention. Insights from a citizen’s manifesto and ongoing debates on citizen science in India show how the relations of science and democracy can be reworked that has implications for India’s science policy. These experiments represent possible roads not taken and highlight the need for greater plurality in alternate futures globally. The critical knowledge dimension of inclusion needs to also be more open to dissenting scientists who have pro-actively engaged with society to shape an alternate science.

PDF

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

  1. GoI. 2020. Science, Technology, and Innovation Policy. New Delhi, Ministry of Science and Technology.
  2. EPW, 2001. Editorial. Science: Grassroot Concerns. Economic and Political Weekly, 36(1): 6.
  3. EPW 2019. Editorial. Ancient India,Modern Science, and Insecurities. Economic and Political Weekly, 54(2): 9.
  4. Gibbons, M. 1999. Science's new social contract with society. Nature, 402(6761supp), C81.
  5. Wynne, B. Felt, U., Callon, M., Gonçalves, M. E., Jasanoff, S., Jepsen, M., & Tallacchini, M. (2007). Taking European knowledge society seriously. Report of the Expert Group on Science and Governance to the Science, Economy and Society Directorate.
  6. Stilgoe, J., Owen, R., & Macnaghten, P. 2013. Developing a framework for responsible innovation. Research Policy, 42(9), 1568–1580.
  7. Pandey, P., Valkenburg, G., Mamidipudi, A., & Bijker, W. 2020. Responsible Research and Innovation in the Global South: Agriculture, Renewable Energy and the Pursuit of Symmetry. Science, Technology and Society, 25(2), 215-222.
  8. Prasad, C. S. 2020. Constructing Alternative Socio-technical Worlds: Re-imagining RRI through SRI in India. Science, Technology and Society, 25(2), 291–307.
  9. Dash, B. 2020. Science, State and Meteorology in India. Dialogue – Science, Scientists, and Society, 3(1).
  10. Bhadra, M. 2013. Fighting Nuclear Energy, Fighting for India’s Democracy. Science as Culture, 22(2), 238–246.
  11. Varughese, S. S. 2020. Expertise at the ‘Deliberative Turn’: Multiple Publics and the Social Distribution of Technoscientific Expertise. Dialogue – Science, Scientists, and Society, 3(1).
  12. Abrol, D. 2013 New science, technology and innovation policy: A critical assessment. Economic and Political Weekly, 48(9): 10-13.
  13. Prasad, C. S. 2014. Revisiting Science’s Social Contract. Seminar, 654, 55-61.
  14. Sekhsaria, P., and Thayyil N 2019. Citizen science in ecology in India: A preliminary mapping and analysis. Delhi: DST Centre for Policy Research, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi.
  15. Strasser, B. J., and Haklay, M. 2018. Citizen Science: Expertise, Democracy, and Public Participation. Citizen Science, Excerpt of the second part from the Swiss Science Council (SSC) policy analysis 1/ 201876. https:// wissenschaftsrat.ch/ images/ stories/ pdf/ en/ SWR_PolicyAnalysis_CitizenScience_INHALT_EN_excerpt.pdf
  16. Strasser, B. J., Baudry, J., Mahr, D., Sanchez, G., & Tancoigne, E. 2018. “Citizen Science”? Rethinking Science and Public Participation. Science & Technology Studies, 32, 52–76.
  17. Irwin, A. 2015. Citizen Science and Scientific Citizenship: Same Words, Different Meanings? In Schiele, B., Marec, J.L. and Baranger, P. (eds) Science Communication Today – 2015. Nancy: Presses Universitaires de Nancy, pp29-38.
  18. Datta, A., Naniwadekar, R., Rao, M., Sreenivasan, R., and Hiresavi, V. 2018. Hornbill Watch: A citizen science initiative for Indian hornbills. Freshwater Science 14(3), 6.
  19. Vattakaven, T., Surendran, H., and Rajagopal, P. 2019. A decade of the India Biodiversity Portal: Planning ahead with technology to enhance citizen science participation in India. Biodiversity Information Science and Standards, 3, e37202.
  20. Visvanathan, S. 2006. Alternative Science. Theory, Culture & Society, 23(2–3), 164–169.
  21. Sharma, D. 1976. Growth and Failures of India’s Science Policy, Economic and Political Weekly, 11(51): 1969-71.
  22. Jaffry, A., Rangarajan, M., Ekbal, B., & Kannan, K. P. 1983. Towards a People's Science Movement. Economic and Political Weekly, 18(11), 372-376.
  23. Nandy, A. 1988. Ed. Science, Hegemony and Violence. Delhi: Oxford University Press.
  24. Shiva, V. 1991. The Violence of the Green Revolution: Third World Agriculture, Ecology, and Politics (Penang, Malaysia: Third World Network).
  25. Alvares, C. A. 1992 Science, development and violence: The revolt against modernity. Oxford University Press, USA.
  26. Visvanathan, S. 1997. A carnival for science: essays on science, technology, and development. Oxford University Press, USA.
  27. Guha, R. 1988. The alternative science movement: an interim assessment, Lokayan Bulletin, 6(3), pp. 7–25.
  28. Nanda, M. 1998. Reclaiming Modern Science for Third World Progressive Social Movements, Economic and Political Weekly, 33(16): 915-922.
  29. Varma, R. 2001. People’s Science Movements and Science Wars? Economic and Political Weekly,
  30. (52), 4796–4802.
  31. Rajan, S. R. 2005. Science, state and violence: An Indian critique reconsidered. Science as Culture, 14(3), 265–281.
  32. Prasad, S. C. 2002. Exploring Gandhian science: A case study of the Khadi movement. Doctoral dissertation, Indian Institute of Technology, New Delhi, India.
  33. Prasad, S. C. 2005. Science and technology in civil society: The innovation trajectory of spirulina algal technology. Economic and Political Weekly. 40: 4363-4372.
  34. Ziman, J. 2016. Science in civil society. Imprint Academic, Exeter.
  35. Prasad, S. C. 2001. Towards an understanding of Gandhi’s views on science. Economic and Political Weekly. 36(39): 3721-3732.
  36. KICS. 2011. Knowledge Swaraj: An Indian Manifesto on Science and Technology. Knowledge In Civil Society (KICS), Hyderabad, India. http:// kicsforum.in/ kics/ kicsmatters/ Knowledgeswaraj- an-Indian-S&T-manifesto.pdf
  37. Sadanandan, R. 2020. Kerala’s response to COVID-19. Indian Journal of Public Health, 64(6), 99.
  38. Rahim, A. A., and Chacko, T. V. 2020. Replicating the Kerala state’s successful COVID-19 containment model: Insights on what worked. Indian Journal of Community Medicine, 45(3), 261.
  39. Golechha, M. 2020. COVID-19 Containment in Asia’s Largest Urban Slum Dharavi-Mumbai, India: Lessons for Policymakers Globally. Journal of Urban Health : Bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine, 1–6.

Similar Articles

1 2 3 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.